literature

Icarus

Deviation Actions

ProvenParadox's avatar
Published:
862 Views

Literature Text

On broken stone by raging seas
And ghostly chapels in dead trees:
The sibyl, with the blinded eye,
Our prophet, chose to touch the sky.
And in your veins the blood will freeze,
From one last waltz on winter's breeze
The oily wings will melt with ease.
Now dropping with an eagle's cry
O'er broken stone.

In dryer parts of town than these,
The children pray on bended knees,
To become gods and learn to fly,
But we all know the hemlock's lie.
Old artificer, end this please,
On broken stone.
In an experimentation with styles, I've made a nice little rondeau for you to read.

:iconthewrittenrevolution: Members:
what is more important, style or content? how do you feel about the last line here? is "o'er" alright? any suggestions for improvement?
© 2010 - 2024 ProvenParadox
Comments33
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Redriddle0's avatar
:iconthewrittenrevolution:

In order to answer your questions, I will first start by saying that I find the poem enticingly seductive and alluring. Why? Firstly, because you have created an interesting, ethereal atmosphere, both through the choice of words and images. The mythological elements, as well as the rhyme scheme aid in this purpose. Hence I will answer that, at least in what I am concerned, I find style is, in some cases, more important than content. This is not to say that the lack of idea, theme or substance is a good formula; but exploiting the power and tastiness of words is something extraordinary. The fact that you have retold such a beautiful myth in such a sweet style and short length is golden. I find particularly beautiful the last verses, which divert us from the original space, and bring up a conclusive statement, which symbolizes Icarus's futile ambition.

As regards the o'er, I would say it is alright regarding the rhyme scheme you chose. However, I find it somewhat disruptive of the flow (maybe me reading it to a particular rhythm, so don't worry).

As regards improvement... Well, I think you have quite a dominion over style, henceforward I would suggest introducing substance. This means, the experimentation with the rondeau proved extremely effective, yet I felt there was something lacking in the message, some sort of vacuity. Most probably it is because of the rondeau's fixed scheme and brevity. In any case, this is but an opinion, hence feel free to challenge it.

PD: I love mythology, and commentary aside, I love the way you used the story.